Hannah's posterous

Hannah's posterous

burbling gently

  • About Hannah
  • Academia
  • Photography
  • Coriolanus. ancient / modern / politics / warfare

    • 29 Jan 2012
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • cinema drama films politics roman history shakespeare
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    So our virtues
    Lie in the interpretation of the time:
    And power, unto itself most commendable,
    Hath not a tomb so evident as a chair
    To extol what it hath done.

    Tullus Aufidius - Coriolanus, Act IV, Scene 7

    I saw Ralph Fiennes' Coriolanus this afternoon and just, wow.  I was expecting it to be pretty good and to enjoy it, but I wasn't expecting it to be quite so powerful and fascinating - I'm a little bit blown away to be honest. 

    I didn't know the play at all, but I know the story of Coriolanus from my Plutarch (interestingly he is barely in Livy - which is a shame for me, because I know much more about Livy and am much better able to interpret his politics and historiography).  I had no idea Shakespeare was such an astute reader of his ancient writers (though I'm not hugely surprised), and I'm completely fascinated by the presentation of the relationship between politics and the mililtary, the importance and the inflexibility of integrity, the dangers of populism and the importance of the popular voice, and the nature of betrayal in the film - the way that Shakespeare does it, for Ancient Rome, and the way that Fiennes does it, which feels very reflective of contemporary politics.  

    It hits so many fabulous notes - like the way Coriolanus shoves the tribune Sicinius while he is railing against the people, when the person of the tribune was sacrosanct (which becomes more beautifully complex through Coriolanus' warning that pandering to the people will create divisions in the political elite - which is part of what happened in the first century, and through the fact that Caesar took the 'abuse' of the tribunes as a justification for kick-starting the civil war in 49, making Coriolanus' intrangigence as complicit as the tribunes in the strife that follows).  

    I also love Coriolanus' chair, at the end when Volumnia comes to plead with him (and, btw, OMG VANESSA REDGRAVE, how is she not nominated for all the awards, or is this something I get mad about next year?) - and the way that it stands as a throne, with monarchy being the anathema of the Roman Republic, making Coriolanus' pride reflect the last king of Rome - Tarquinius Superbus (i.e. the proud). 

    I'm not sure what I want to do with all of this yet - but this is all by way of saying that I'm going away to read some stuff and think some coherent thoughts.  And that you should go and see Coriolanus, because it is truly something quite special. 

    • Tweet
  • Being aware of what you're buying and owning your choices.

    • 26 Jan 2012
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • confused thoughts issues social justice tech thoughts
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    Six months earlier, the 22-year-old had moved to Chengdu, in southwest China, to become one of the millions of human cogs powering the largest, fastest and most sophisticated manufacturing system on earth. That system has made it possible for Apple and hundreds of other companies to build devices almost as quickly as they can be dreamed up.

    “He’s in trouble,” the caller told Mr. Lai’s father. “Get to the hospital as soon as possible.”

    In the last decade, Apple has become one of the mightiest, richest and most successful companies in the world, in part by mastering global manufacturing. Apple and its high-technology peers — as well as dozens of other American industries — have achieved a pace of innovation nearly unmatched in modern history.

    via nytimes.com

    Let's start with the acknowledgement that I love my iPhone, and I kinda want an iPad, and they're pretty and I find they work for me, and blah blah blah.

    But. But. With that love comes a discomfort about what goes into my iPhone and me being able to afford it. I've been being itched by this since listening to the recent This American Life episode, Mr Daisey and the Apple Factory. Now, I know that this is true of pretty much every piece of technology, and I know that Apple gets picked up on a lot for this because it makes the most famous tech and the most money. But it also does that in part by selling an aura of superiority - which makes it a much more appealing target than other companies. And frankly I think it ought to be challenged on those grounds too - but I am aware that this is because Mac evangelists drive me up the frickin' wall. 

    So here's a thing - I think if you're aware of all of this stuff (about Apple and about other tech) and still choose to buy it, that's ok. That's your choice.  But I'd like you to be able to explain it to me, and for me to be able to explain it to myself.  You (and I) need to own that choice.   

    But I want to ask some questions of myself: would I be willing to pay £50 more for my phone, if that was something that went to making working conditions better for the people who make it (yes)? If Apple (or whoever) don't give me that choice - what can I do to make them give me that choice? I could stop buying any tech (but I alone probably won't make a difference - but then, that's what every one person says, right) - I could petition Apple to make conditions better. I could buy something other than Apple (definitely an option).  If I were a visually creative type, I'd probably more inclined to go Apple - in which case, I'd want to ask at what point does my commitment to trying to make the world a better place clash with the work I'd be doing with my Mac to do it.  When do I say, I'll work slower and it'll be more painful, but I'll try and work with tech that is the most 'fair'?  I'm still working through this and making my mind up (but I get to feel ok about the fact I'm thinking about it, right? my insufferable western privilege goes that far, right?)

    'Cause this is something that's been itching at me of late - if we want the world to be fairer we have to be willing to be personally inconvenienced, because we are not the be all and end all of everything. And if we're not up for that, then what are we doing?

     

    • Tweet
  • "It's just money: it's made up." / Make it up BETTER

    • 21 Jan 2012
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • economics films finance politics society thinking
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    1980s. Wall Street. Greed is Good. 

    2010s (however we're verbalising the number...). Margin Call. The financial system is f****d up. 

    How we've grown. 

    I really liked Margin Call.  It's perhaps not the greatest, most cinematic film on the planet, or even in the cinema right now (in a way, it's like a play) - but it is smart, engaging, tense, full of characters who remain sympathetic while also being repugnant (played by some great actors), and has a debate that provokes a response but without manipulating you towards moral outrage. It lets you get there on your own, if that's where your emotions and your brain takes you. It thinks you're pretty bright (and, as the last film I saw was War Horse, which pulled every available emotional string, I really appreciated that).  I really liked it, and I was really discomforted by it.  It's the kind of film where you come out at the end and you want to go away and put on some music, or some TV, or read some terrible teen vampire fiction, and pretend that the world isn't largely in a terrible mess and that the way we do money is a huge part of that.  However, it's also the kind of film that challenges you not to do that - that challenges you to go out and live with this discomfort and to think harder and do better and to try and do something to make it better. Or at least to not hide away from it.    

    There's a moment towards the end of the film where two sets of characters have two parallel conversations about what they're about to do and the people they're going to hurt.  One, between Sam (Kevin Spacey) and Peter (Zachary Quinto) engages with the moral problem of what they're going to do and the impact it's going to have, acknowledges that they screwed up, they're wrong, they're about to do a whole lot of damage, but - ultimately - ends with them compromising on that and going to do the job they're paid to do (and as Sam says, sadly, at the end, 'And I need the money'...)

    The other, between Seth (Penn Badgley, trying to shake Dan Humphrey hard, and doing pretty darn well) and Will (Paul Bettany) starts from how much money they make, silly money, and moves on to the Seth suddenly realising that real people are really going to get hurt, and he's not just playing with numbers on a screen and taking home a quarter of a million dollars a year.   And then Will says this: 

    "Jesus, Seth. Listen, if you really want to do this with your life you have to believe you're necessary - and you are. People want to live like this in their cars and big fuckin' houses they can pay for, then you're necessary. The only reason that they all get to continue living like kings is because we've got our fingers on the scales in their favour. take my hand off and then the whole world gets really fuckin' fair, really fuckin' quickly and nobody actually wants that. They say they do but they don't. They want what we have to give them, but they also want to, y'know, play innocent and pretend they have no idea where it came from. Well that's more hypocrisy than I can swallow, so fuck 'em. Fuck normal people." 

    And you know what.  He's right. In a lot of ways, he is right. People, by and large, do want to live with their cars and their big houses and their shiny tech, and they don't really want to confront where it all comes from and what the hidden costs are, so they buy the lie from the money men that they can have all of this, and from the advertisers that they should have all of this, and from the politicians that they can give them all of this. And then every so often, reality bites really hard. 

    At the end of the film, Sam has a conversation with Fuld (Jeremy Irons) - the CEO of the company, where Tuld says, "There there have always been and there will always be the same percentage of winnera and losers. Yeah, there may be more of us today than there's ever been. But the percentages stay exactly the same." 

    But here's the thing. What if we don't want the percentages to say the same? What if we want to encourage people to stop believing the lie that Will is talking about? What if we want to 'ground' money - to stop the cost of living from going up and up and up (thus making us more and more concerned with making more and more money, even when it has less and less value), to say, actually, we would all be living in a better place if the housing market crashed and brought prices back to a sane place (and I speak as someone trying to sell a house - the question is, am I ready to make a loss for the sake of a saner society?).  How do we do that.  What do we talk about - how and where do we have those conversations, and how do we make the people with the power to make the chages listen to us (or start to take the power to make the changes ourselves) when we say, 'Stop lying to us, stop telling us we want all of this crap we don't really need and that it'll make us happy, because it won't, and stop telling us that you can give it to us at no cost to anyone else, because you can't.'  How do we say, 'Stop trying to fix the old system, because IT SUCKS,' and build a new one that sucks less?  And these are the questions I want to start trying to answer. 

    • Tweet
  • rules I need to learn to follow

    • 18 Dec 2011
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost
    15. You don't have to read every book you buy, and you certainly don't have to finish the book you've started.
    via guardian.co.uk

    Maybe if enough people, like Robert McCrum, reiterate this one it'll sink in. I've never been any good at ditching books I've started. This year alone I spent six months reading Jonathan Littel's The Kindly Ones, which is possibly one of the bleakest books on the PLANET. I kept at it, because it was a book that was partly about the banality of evil, so I thought that part of the point was for it to be long and dull and unending and bleak so that you just want the damn war to be over now, please. But frankly, it wasn't worth it, and I can't remember which critic said that using overt references to Greek tragedy where your lead *is* Orestes means that your lead isn't normal and his evil ceases to be banal, therefore undermining the main point of the novel - but they were right.

    Having sold it to you so well - if anyone wants to put themselves through it, I'll give you my copy, it's a bit too bashed after a six-month reading period to go to the charity shop.

    Currently I'm forcing myself to finish 'If on a Winter's Night a Traveller' by Italo Calvino. I confess that if it had been any longer than its 250 pages I would have chucked it. Wait, I'm not supposed to be confessing to that. I should have chucked it. I bought it because it sounded up my street and David Mitchell (one of my favourite authors) recommended it - but honestly, it's taken me 160 pages to get into it, and that's TOO LONG for a book of that length (or possibly of any length) - Don Quixote may have taken 200 pages to grab me, but at least then I had another 800 pages to enjoy.

    Speaking of Don Quixote - if anyone's going travelling any time soon, I can give you a copy. No girl with limited shelf space needs two copies of that book, and it's a very good one for travelling with.

     

    • Tweet
  • cutting and pasting: politicians talking about faith

    • 17 Dec 2011
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    Cameron: In a speech in Oxford on the 400th anniversary of the King James Bible, the prime minister called for a revival of traditional Christian values to counter Britain's "moral collapse".

    Cameron told the Church of England clergy gathered in Oxford that a return to Christian values could counter the country's "moral collapse" and blamed a "passive tolerance" of immoral behaviour for this summer's riots, Islamic extremism, City excess and Westminster scandals.

    Obama: Christ's birth made the angels rejoice and attracted shepherds and kings from afar.  He was a manifestation of God’s love for us.  And He grew up to become a leader with a servant’s heart who taught us a message as simple as it is powerful:  that we should love God, and love our neighbor as ourselves.

    Cameron: Describing himself as a "committed" but only "vaguely practising" Christian, the PM admitted he was "full of doubts" about big theological issues.

    Obama: So long as the gifts and the parties are happening, it’s important for us to keep in mind the central message of this season, and keep Christ’s words not only in our thoughts, but also in our deeds.  In this season of hope, let’s help those who need it most –- the homeless, the hungry, the sick and shut in.  In this season of plenty, let’s reach out to those who struggle to find work or provide for their families.  In this season of generosity, let’s give thanks and honor to our troops and our veterans, and their families who've sacrificed so much for us.  And let’s welcome all those who are happily coming home."

    Cameron: Mr Cameron said people often argued that "politicians shouldn't 'do God'" - a reference to a comment famously made by former No 10 spin doctor Alistair Campbell when Tony Blair was asked about his religion. "If by that they mean we shouldn't try to claim a direct line to God for one particular political party, they could not be more right," the PM said."

    Quotes from the BBC on Cameron's speech yesterday, the Guardian on the speech, and Sojourners' blog on Obama's remarks on lighting up the White House Christmas tree. 

    I'm not entirely sure what I'm getting at here - but my gut feels a difference between Obama and Cameron's expressions of Christianity (verbally in this kind of situation, and in the policies they espouse and try and get enacted). I'll freely admit that my gut is definitely influenced by my general liking for Obama and my general distaste for Cameron.

    I feel like Cameron may believe what he says about Christianity and Britain, and his own faith, but I don't find it reassuring.  His comments about a moral collapse being behind the summer riots are problematic for me, because - while I think the statement is arguably true, I think the moral collapse is in the social and economic situation that has created an incredibly unequal and unjust balance of power in Britain - and Cameron thinks it is about 'broken' families, and people not working and being willing to rob to get what they want (and, let's not get this wrong, looting is not a good thing, but Cameron isn't going deep enough in his analysis of causation).   His comment about being committed but only vaguely practicing is, for me, symptomatic of the problem.  I know it's there to soothe those who are concerned about politicians who think they have a hot-line to God - and Cameron is right that politicians shouldn't claim that, I completely agree with him there.  But I feel like if you are committed to a faith, then you ought to be more than vaguely practicing, otherwise how are you actually committed?  And I don't believe the way the current government is concerned with trying to restore the pre-crash status quo for the financial industry is *not* about justice and I don't buy into it as a Christian approach to building a society. 

    Obama's faith and expression of his understanding of Christianity is something I've always had sympathy with - it's how I came to be aware him, when a friend sent me a link to his keynote address at 2006's Call to Renewal conference, in which he talked about Christianity and politics.  I don't know if I sympathise with understanding of Christianity because I grew up in a vaguely lefty environment, or if I've ended up on the political left because I grew up with this understanding of Christianity.  Either way, I'm aware of my innate bias, is what I'm saying.

    I think Obama has as many questions about big theological issues as Cameron claims to have (and many Christians do), but I think that he is committed and committed to practicing his faith in the way he tries to shape the world - and I don't think it's about him having a hot-line to God, I think he believes what he believes and his personality doesn't split the Christian from the Politician from the Human.  I don't think he gets it right all of the time, and I know that both Christianity and Politics are both very complicated - and I'm pretty sure that the fact that Obama also knows that and doesn't want to over simplify is a large part of many of his political woes.  But I think his approach to being a Christian in Politics is going to end up with us in a better place than Cameron's will.

    • Tweet
  • Sometimes, the second verse is the one to pay attention to...

    • 16 Dec 2011
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

    He came down to earth from heaven,
    Who is God and Lord of all,
    And His shelter was a stable,
    And His cradle was a stall:
    With the poor, and mean, and lowly,
    Lived on earth our Saviour holy.

    Following on from Jim Wallis on where the spirit of Christmas really is being lost, countering the Fox Newsies...

    I was at work's carol service today, where, as you do, we sung 'Once in Royal David's City'.  You know the one, tends to start with a beautiful solo, lovely imagery of Mary and Jesus, ends with a fabulous descant.   I love it - it's a favourite of mine. I'm traditionalist about my Christmases, and so I do require there to be Carols from Kings on Christmas Eve (and, frankly, on Christmas morning on the radio), starting with this carol.   But today - and maybe it was just having read that blog post yesterday, or the fact that I work at a place that is all about ending poverty and injustice - it was the second verse that really struck me.  With the poor, and mean, and lowly... I hope the likes of Rick Perry and the talking heads of Fox News remember that when they're singing this carol this Christmas.

    (and yeah, I gave you the nice music, too). 

    04_Once_In_Royal_David's_City.m4a
    (download)
    Click here to download:
    04_Once_In_Royal_David's_City.m4a (4.58 MB)

     

    • Tweet
  • I'm not always a fan of yelling at the people on the other side of an argument

    • 15 Dec 2011
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost
    The Real War on Christmas ... by Fox News | Jim Wallis | God's Politics Blog |
    Last year, Americans spent $450 billion on Christmas. Clean water for the whole world, including every poor person on the planet would cost about $20 billion. Let’s just call that what it is: A material blasphemy of the Christmas season.
    via sojo.net

    ... but sometimes it's really the only thing to do, when you do it properly.

    • Tweet
  • all the different camera apps

    • 1 Nov 2011
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • experimentation photography
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost


    Once upon a time, I bought a compact digital camera so that I didn't have to cart my DSLR out and about when I was just likely to be taking snapshots or didn't want to risk taking the Big 'I'm A Target' Camera with me.   Now I rarely use it, as it's been supplanted in my pocket/bag by the iPhone 4 (yes yes, I know, the Big 'I'm a Target' Phone - there is still a role for the compact camera in my life, I know...)

    In the last 16 months, according to iTunes, I have experimented with at least 19 different apps (and that's not counting the two I just put on the phone, ahem).  So I thought I would try and put up some photos from a bunch of them along with my thoughts.  

    --------

    Best Camera - the photographer Chase Jarvis' app, it spins off the idea that the Best Camera you have is the camera you have with you. Which is nice - and this was one of the first camera apps I ever got and played with - but the app's only so-so in comparison to others for me nowadays. I use Camera+ instead, because I find it has a greater variety of options. 

    Img_1129

     

    Camera+ A huge fave of mine nowadays, for its huge range of filter options and easy cropping.  You can import photos or take them in the app. 

    Img_3247

     

    Camera Bag - some fun filters to play with, and you simply tap the photo to change the colour balances. I still keep this one on the phone, though I've not used it as much recently.  I like the cinema filter a lot (so does Scott Pilgrim, though his face doesn't suggest he likes anything). 

    Img_2131

     

    Swankolab - another of the 'lets make filters and processing that do just about everything' apps.  But it's a serious faff to remember all the different options and what they do, so I got rid of it. 

    Img_1859

     

    If it's quick and simple you want:

    ShakeIt - the wonderful world of fake polaroid.  This is literally all this app does - and other apps have polaroid filters or frames.  If you want to replicate the polaroid experience to the extent of the 'shaking the image to make it develop faster' feature, go for it, just don't chuck your phone across the room while you do... 

    Img_0160

     

    Old Camera - bizarrely, this was recommended by the film director Mark Romanek (back in the day, when he was working on Never Let Me Go and taking a lot of photos of Andrew Garfield, as you would, ahem).  It's really nice and simple for black and whites and sepias.  It goes on and off the phone, randomly. 

    Img_1653

     

    Hipstamatic - probably still my very favourite camera app, though there are almost too many options for it now and I end up sticking with a few favourite settings.  But once you have those worked out it's a joy, I tell you. Be hipster (the silly, miserable, hipsters are just spoiling it for the rest of us who like cameras and notebooks and big black rimmed glasses). 

     

    (download)
    Click here to download:
    all-the-different-camera-apps-ieuyCiiFgjtoEfjnpfIl.zip (458 KB)

     

    See also, Instagram! My new favourite app. So quick and easy, it has replaced hipstamatic in my usage, if not in my affections (quite yet).  It has fewer options, so is easier to use on the go, and is a social media fiend. 

    Img_3366

    In the 'disappeared from the phone' app camp - Lo-fi, retro-i-ness. Pretty, but also pretty much given up on by me, because it was such a pain scrolling  through all the possible filters. 

    Img_1700

     

    In the 'I'm a narcissist' app camp -  IncrediBooth. Now with slightly odd 'bokeh lights in front of the face' possibilities for the shy narcissist. 

    (download)
    Click here to download:
    all-the-different-camera-apps-xlDkgIeaqEwDubmEJBnb.zip (394 KB)

     

    TiltShiftFocus - yay for miniaturising.  I enjoy this for daft things.  And for making photos of cities taken out of smudgy university tower blocks windows something worth looking at. 

     

    Img_0708

     

    Quiption - for those who want to make photo postcards with text. Very limited options though, so it's unlikely to hang around. 

    Img_3349

    --------

    I never really find that app reviews tell me whether I'm going to like an app or not - it's a bit hit and miss.  I like being able to take a photo quickly, either in an app that will let me filter it immediately (like hipstamatic or instagram) or give me a good range of options afterwards (like Camera + or Camera Bag).  Those are probably the four apps I use most - and I also keep PS Express on board because it has good 'proper' editing functions (rather than just crazy filters).  And I just put PicFrame and Diptic on so that I can play with multiple photos and frames a bit. More of them later... 

     

     

     

    • Tweet
  • PHD Comics: Division of Labor

    • 31 Oct 2011
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost

      **footnote:Thanks to Heeyon from U. Michigan for this comic idea
     
       
    via phdcomics.com

    I love you still, PhD Comics.

    • Tweet
  • Makoto Fujimura | The Four Gospels Frontispieces

    • 26 Oct 2011
    • 0 Responses
    •  views
    • Edit
    • Delete
    • Tags
    • Autopost
    Media_httpwwwmakotofu_zvdby
    via makotofujimura.com

    These are *gorgeous*
    This picture is the frontispiece for John ("In the Beginning...") - isn't it just the most beautiful image?

    • Tweet
  • « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 … 22 23 Next »
  • About

    Embryo Researcher and Part-time Globetrotter.

    16761 Views
  • Archive

    • 2012 (4)
      • January (4)
    • 2011 (73)
      • December (4)
      • November (1)
      • October (12)
      • September (12)
      • July (15)
      • June (1)
      • May (5)
      • April (7)
      • March (9)
      • February (4)
      • January (3)
    • 2010 (125)
      • December (6)
      • November (15)
      • October (7)
      • September (8)
      • August (5)
      • July (5)
      • June (4)
      • May (9)
      • April (30)
      • March (15)
      • February (16)
      • January (5)
    • 2009 (25)
      • December (12)
      • November (13)

    Get Updates

    Follow this site »
    You're following this site (Edit)
    You're a contributor here (Edit)
    This is your site (Edit)
    Subscribe by email »
    Get the latest updates in your email box automatically.
    Loading...
    Subscribe via RSS
    TwitterFacebook
  • Sites I Like

    • my twitter
    • my tumblr
    • my flickr